Get started on your first Tastewise market research project for free with our Free Trial!

Business

What will a Trump presidency mean for the Food and Beverage industry in 2024?

Blog image Trump presidency
November 11, 20243 min
Kelia Losa Reinoso photo
Kelia Losa Reinoso
Nestle_d2abbcf93c
Campbells_045f1019f5
Pepsi_c18b4571a3
Kraft_Heinz_886d23c26c
Givaudan_77eff91905
Nestle_d2abbcf93c
Campbells_045f1019f5
Pepsi_c18b4571a3
Kraft_Heinz_886d23c26c
Givaudan_77eff91905

With Donald Trump having taken office again as U.S. president, the food and beverage (F&B) industry is closely examining how his administration’s proposed policies may impact production, pricing, and international trade. As the sector adapts to shifting consumer demands and market challenges, industry professionals are watching for how changes in regulation, trade, and economic policies could influence their operations.

Trump’s Proposed Policies and Their Potential Impact on the Food and Beverage Industry

Blog image Trump presidency

Project 2025, from a think tank aligned with Trump’s administration, outlines substantial regulatory and tax changes for the food and beverage (F&B) industry. According to The Conversation, Project 2025 includes a proposal to “deregulate U.S. dietary guidelines and food assistance programs,” such as SNAP and WIC, which could impact everything from school meal funding to consumer access to nutritional foods.

From a strategic standpoint, these changes signal a need for F&B companies to reassess their approach to product development and marketing. With potential shifts in consumer demand and nutritional standards, companies may need to explore new ways to meet consumer preferences while navigating evolving regulatory frameworks. 

Without federally mandated dietary guidelines, regions may experience divergent consumer trends, potentially increasing demand for localized or customized product offerings. F&B companies might need to refine their approaches to meet diverse preferences and adjust marketing strategies.

On the financial side, Trump’s proposals to reduce corporate taxes could lower costs for F&B businesses, potentially freeing up capital for investments in R&D, innovation, and technology integration. However, there may also be budget cuts to smaller food assistance programs, which could impact the purchasing power of lower-income consumers. Approximately 12% of the U.S. population relies on programs like SNAP and WIC, representing a significant segment of the market with purchasing power that could be affected by potential program changes.

This shift suggests that F&B companies may want to diversify their product ranges to accommodate potential changes in consumer spending.In light of increased cost consciousness, private label innovation offers a competitive opportunity for companies to provide affordable, quality options that appeal to budget-sensitive consumers.

As industry stakeholders consider these policy directions, the focus will likely be on how to strategically allocate resources to respond to both cost-reduction opportunities and potential shifts in consumer access to food programs.

Potential Impact on Food Prices and R&D Spending

According to The Conversation, “Trump’s policies could lower energy costs due to more domestic fossil fuel production, potentially making U.S.-produced foodstuffs cheaper.” This shift may help U.S. food producers achieve greater competitiveness in both domestic and international markets.

However, the administration’s tariff policies may add cost pressures in other areas. Proposed tariffs, including rates from 10% to 20% on all imports and up to 60% on goods from China, could increase the cost of raw materials and ingredients for manufacturers. 

According to FoodNavigator-USA, Tom Madrecki, VP of Campaigns at the Consumer Brands Association, emphasized that “tariffs are taxes and are not paid by foreign nations. They are paid by U.S. consumers and by U.S. manufacturers.” 

Higher import costs could result in higher prices for both manufacturers and consumers. Manufacturing workers could face reduced perks, such as bonuses, as companies navigate increased import costs, potentially adding to workforce anxiety and cost-conscious spending patterns.

For the F&B industry, the path forward may involve re-evaluating supply chains and potentially seeking domestic or alternative sources for raw materials to manage tariff-related expenses. Additionally, businesses may consider prioritizing R&D spending in areas that help optimize energy use, increase production efficiency, and explore alternatives for tariff-affected ingredients. These strategies could help manufacturers stabilize production costs while maintaining price competitiveness in a complex economic landscape.

Trade Tariffs and Supply Chain Implications for F&B Companies

The Trump administration’s renewed tariff-focused trade policy has significant implications for F&B supply chains. In 2018, during Trump’s previous term, the administration imposed tariffs on thousands of Chinese imports, leading to retaliatory tariffs on U.S. exports. 

The outcome impacted products like pork, fruit, and nuts, creating price increases across the market. 

Rabobank’s Cyrille Filott remarked that these types of tariffs “drive up the cost of products” for consumers, underscoring the financial risk for U.S. F&B companies if trade tensions persist.

To adapt, companies may need to consider AI-powered solutions for managing complex supply chains, allowing them to forecast demand shifts and optimize sourcing to offset some of these additional costs. 

Tools like Tastewise’s AI offer real-time insights on consumer demand and help brands respond quickly to evolving market dynamics, assisting them in remaining competitive amid fluctuating trade policies.

Sustainability Policies in Food and Beverage

Another focal point of Trump’s policy approach is reducing regulations that address environmental sustainability. This may relax mandates on environmental compliance, prioritizing short-term cost savings for producers over global sustainability standards. 

This could pose a competitive disadvantage for U.S. food brands in international markets that increasingly favor sustainable practices, especially in regions like Europe where environmental standards are strict.

For F&B brands, the shift may mean balancing deregulated domestic policies with continued consumer and international demands for sustainable practices. As sustainability remains a priority for global consumers, businesses may need AI-powered solutions to adapt their product sourcing and environmental impact strategies while aligning with market expectations.

AI Solutions for Navigating Regulatory and Economic Shifts

As the F&B industry prepares for potential policy changes, the role of AI in strategic decision-making grows more critical. Tools like those offered by Tastewise empower companies with consumer insights, helping them navigate economic shifts, adjust to tariffs, and manage cost fluctuations. By identifying trends in consumer behavior, pricing, and supply chain conditions, AI-driven platforms can support rapid adaptation to regulatory changes.

For example, with tariffs likely to increase the cost of imports, and even shift product development to align with consumer preferences for domestically produced goods. By incorporating these technologies, F&B businesses can enhance their responsiveness to economic changes and minimize risk in a volatile market landscape.

Trump’s proposed policies for his 2025 term present a complex scenario for the F&B industry, influencing everything from taxation and regulation to supply chain logistics and sustainability efforts. While tax reductions and energy cost savings offer potential financial relief, increased tariffs and deregulation of sustainability measures could create new operational challenges. AI-driven platforms like Tastewise provide F&B companies with a pathway to navigate these complexities, allowing them to leverage real-time insights to adapt efficiently.

What can food intelligence do for you?